Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Determining Architecture's Footprint: Preliminary Methods for Measuring the True Environmental Impact of Buildings

Determining Architecture's Footprint: Preliminary Methods for Measuring the True Environmental Impact of Buildings

Blaine Erickson Brownell
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 32
ISBN13: 9781522569954|ISBN10: 1522569952|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781522587170|EISBN13: 9781522569961
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6995-4.ch002
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Brownell, Blaine Erickson. "Determining Architecture's Footprint: Preliminary Methods for Measuring the True Environmental Impact of Buildings." Reusable and Sustainable Building Materials in Modern Architecture, edited by Gülşah Koç and Bryan Christiansen, IGI Global, 2019, pp. 28-59. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6995-4.ch002

APA

Brownell, B. E. (2019). Determining Architecture's Footprint: Preliminary Methods for Measuring the True Environmental Impact of Buildings. In G. Koç & B. Christiansen (Eds.), Reusable and Sustainable Building Materials in Modern Architecture (pp. 28-59). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6995-4.ch002

Chicago

Brownell, Blaine Erickson. "Determining Architecture's Footprint: Preliminary Methods for Measuring the True Environmental Impact of Buildings." In Reusable and Sustainable Building Materials in Modern Architecture, edited by Gülşah Koç and Bryan Christiansen, 28-59. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6995-4.ch002

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Current approaches to designing sustainable buildings are inadequate for meeting environmental goals. Buildings continue to consume nearly half of all resources, and architects, engineers, and contractors remain complicit in their deficient environmental performance—as well as the consequential global overshoot of resource consumption. It is imperative that the AEC industry pursue an alternative approach to green rating systems with the intent to determine measurable, absolute outcomes. The most appropriate existing model is the ecological footprint (EF) method devised by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees at the University of British Columbia in the early 1990s. EF quantifies the human demand on the environment in terms of both resources and waste, translating these impacts into land area equivalents. This chapter aims to evaluate EF methodology for buildings by analyzing existing models and proposing new approaches while identifying their respective opportunities and limitations.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.