Reference Hub

This research has been cited in:

Article
Mathematical Modeling of Multiattack Behavior Discrimination in the WSN Based on Incidence MatrixComplexity10.1155/2022/2782811
Article
The effects of document's format, size, and storage media on memory forensicsForensic Science International: Digital Investigation10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301692
Conference
Raspberry Pi Forensic Investigation and Evidence Preservation using Blockchain2021 International Conference on Forensics, Analytics, Big Data, Security (FABS)10.1109/FABS52071.2021.9702622

Holistic Analytics of Digital Artifacts: Unique Metadata Association Model

Ashok Kumar Mohan, Sethumadhavan Madathil, Lakshmy K. V.

Source Title: International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics (IJDCF)13(5)

ISSN: 1941-6210|EISSN: 1941-6229|EISBN13: 9781799867524|DOI: 10.4018/IJDCF.20210901.oa5

Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Mohan, Ashok Kumar, et al. "Holistic Analytics of Digital Artifacts: Unique Metadata Association Model." IJDCF vol.13, no.5 2021: pp.78-100. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJDCF.20210901.oa5

APA

Mohan, A. K., Madathil, S., & Lakshmy K. V. (2021). Holistic Analytics of Digital Artifacts: Unique Metadata Association Model. International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics (IJDCF), 13(5), 78-100. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJDCF.20210901.oa5

Chicago

Mohan, Ashok Kumar, Sethumadhavan Madathil, and Lakshmy K. V. "Holistic Analytics of Digital Artifacts: Unique Metadata Association Model," International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics (IJDCF) 13, no.5: 78-100. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJDCF.20210901.oa5

Export Reference

Favorite Full-Issue Download

View Full Text HTML

View Full Text PDF

Abstract

Investigation of every crime scene with digital evidence is predominantly required in identifying almost all atomic files behind the scenes that have been intentionally scrubbed out. Apart from the data generated across digital devices and the use of diverse technology that slows down the traditional digital forensic investigation strategies. Dynamically scrutinizing the concealed or sparse metadata matches from the less frequent archives of evidence spread across heterogeneous sources and finding their association with other artifacts across the collection is still a horrendous task for the investigators. The effort of this article via unique pockets (UP), unique groups (UG), and unique association (UA) model is to address the exclusive challenges mixed up in identifying incoherent associations that are buried well within the meager metadata field-value pairs. Both the existing similarity models and proposed unique mapping models are verified by the unique metadata association model.