Reference Hub8
Cascaded Dilated Deep Residual Network for Volumetric Liver Segmentation From CT Image

Cascaded Dilated Deep Residual Network for Volumetric Liver Segmentation From CT Image

Gajendra Kumar Mourya, Manashjit Gogoi, S. N. Talbar, Prasad Vilas Dutande, Ujjwal Baid
Copyright: © 2021 |Volume: 12 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 12
ISSN: 1947-315X|EISSN: 1947-3168|EISBN13: 9781799861546|DOI: 10.4018/IJEHMC.2021010103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Mourya, Gajendra Kumar, et al. "Cascaded Dilated Deep Residual Network for Volumetric Liver Segmentation From CT Image." IJEHMC vol.12, no.1 2021: pp.34-45. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEHMC.2021010103

APA

Mourya, G. K., Gogoi, M., Talbar, S. N., Dutande, P. V., & Baid, U. (2021). Cascaded Dilated Deep Residual Network for Volumetric Liver Segmentation From CT Image. International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications (IJEHMC), 12(1), 34-45. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEHMC.2021010103

Chicago

Mourya, Gajendra Kumar, et al. "Cascaded Dilated Deep Residual Network for Volumetric Liver Segmentation From CT Image," International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications (IJEHMC) 12, no.1: 34-45. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEHMC.2021010103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Volumetric liver segmentation is a prerequisite for liver transplantation and radiation therapy planning. In this paper, dilated deep residual network (DDRN) has been proposed for automatic segmentation of liver from CT images. The combination of three parallel DDRN is cascaded with fourth DDRN in order to get final result. The volumetric CT data of 40 subjects belongs to “Combined Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation” (CHAOS) challenge 2019 is utilized to evaluate the proposed method. Input image converted into three images using windowing ranges and fed to three DDRN. The output of three DDRN along with original image fed to the fourth DDRN as an input. The output of cascaded network is compared with the three parallel DDRN individually. Obtained results were quantitatively evaluated with various evaluation parameters. The results were submitted to online evaluation system, and achieved average dice coefficient is 0.93±0.02; average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) is 4.89±0.91. In conclusion, obtained results are prominent and consistent.