Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub3
Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Brunei Case Study

Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Brunei Case Study

David Hassell, Kok Yueh Lee
Copyright: © 2020 |Volume: 1 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 17
ISSN: 2644-1624|EISSN: 2644-1640|EISBN13: 9781799804000|DOI: 10.4018/IJITLHE.2020010104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Hassell, David, and Kok Yueh Lee. "Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Brunei Case Study." IJITLHE vol.1, no.1 2020: pp.37-53. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJITLHE.2020010104

APA

Hassell, D. & Lee, K. Y. (2020). Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Brunei Case Study. International Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (IJITLHE), 1(1), 37-53. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJITLHE.2020010104

Chicago

Hassell, David, and Kok Yueh Lee. "Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Brunei Case Study," International Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (IJITLHE) 1, no.1: 37-53. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJITLHE.2020010104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This article presents an evaluation of the use of peer and self-assessment as part of the learning process in a public speaking assessment coursework, with students from two departments taking part. Students were assessed by themselves, their peers and the lecturer using an online platform, Google forms, utilizing a set of rubrics. The marks were compared between markers to identify similarities and differences. After the process, student feedback on the experience was obtained using a questionnaire utilizing the Likert seven point scale to rate different questions. Analysis of the marks awarded found that whilst there might be correlations between different markers (i.e. peer – self) for marks on certain subsections of the work, there was no overall correlation between marks. Student perceptions to the exercise indicated that the use of rubrics was well received; students considered it a fair assessment method and it provided information on how to perform well in the assessment.