Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub10
Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Management Under Price and Demand Uncertainty

Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Management Under Price and Demand Uncertainty

Pritee Ray
Copyright: © 2021 |Volume: 10 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 16
ISSN: 2160-9772|EISSN: 2160-9799|EISBN13: 9781799858973|DOI: 10.4018/IJSDA.2021040102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Ray, Pritee. "Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Management Under Price and Demand Uncertainty." IJSDA vol.10, no.2 2021: pp.17-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSDA.2021040102

APA

Ray, P. (2021). Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Management Under Price and Demand Uncertainty. International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), 10(2), 17-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSDA.2021040102

Chicago

Ray, Pritee. "Agricultural Supply Chain Risk Management Under Price and Demand Uncertainty," International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA) 10, no.2: 17-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSDA.2021040102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Agricultural supply chain (ASC) plays a vital role for sustainability as it is the main source of food supply. ASC encounters more sources of risk due to seasonality, perishability, and weather conditions, which makes the global food security system complex. This paper develops an optimization model for a perishable product supply chain to decide the optimal risk management strategy that maximizes the decision maker's expected profit under demand and price uncertainty. A base-case scenario is considered to show the impact of risk management strategy on performance improvement. The expected profit of the decision maker is obtained for different combination of strategies, and sensitivity analysis is performed to show the impact of perishability on the percentage of improvement from the base case scenario. The results show that backup supplier strategy is very effective during the yield disruption, but it is not as effective during harvest disruption. Hence, a single approach is inadequate to provide solution in all types of risk scenarios; thus, the combination of approaches is most effective.