Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reviewing the Ethics and Philosophy Behind Social Media's Crowdsourced Panopticon

Reviewing the Ethics and Philosophy Behind Social Media's Crowdsourced Panopticon

Amanda Furiasse
Copyright: © 2022 |Volume: 13 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 4
ISSN: 1947-3451|EISSN: 1947-346X|EISBN13: 9781683181675|DOI: 10.4018/IJT.302627
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Furiasse, Amanda. "Reviewing the Ethics and Philosophy Behind Social Media's Crowdsourced Panopticon." IJT vol.13, no.1 2022: pp.1-4. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.302627

APA

Furiasse, A. (2022). Reviewing the Ethics and Philosophy Behind Social Media's Crowdsourced Panopticon. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 13(1), 1-4. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.302627

Chicago

Furiasse, Amanda. "Reviewing the Ethics and Philosophy Behind Social Media's Crowdsourced Panopticon," International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) 13, no.1: 1-4. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.302627

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Philosopher Jeremy Weissman theorizes a new approach to social media surveillance by utilizing a familiar theoretical model: the Panopticon. In effect, Weissman argues that social media has transformed ordinary people into prison guards within the Panopticon's public watchtower and endowed ordinary individuals with the power to track, survey, and discipline elite officials, once shielded from public scrutiny. This new power, however, comes with a catch. Social media subsumes individuals within an anonymous, de-individualized public, which erases individual difference while simultaneously and paradoxically promising to amplify that very difference. This review critically examines this paradoxical tension and the ethical concerns and challenges raised by social media's propensity to elicit anonymity.