Reference Hub

This research has been cited in:

Article
Cross-Sectoral Digital Platform as a Tool for Innovation Ecosystem DevelopmentSustainability10.3390/su132111686
Article
Investigating the Determinants of New Technology Entrepreneurial Performance: an Empirical Study with PLS-SEM and MGAJournal of the Knowledge Economy10.1007/s13132-023-01359-w
Article
Digital capability requirements and improvement strategies: Organizational socialization of AI teammatesInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103504
Article
How and When Does Big Data Analytics Capability Boost Innovation Performance?Sustainability10.3390/su15054036
Article
Understanding the adoption context of China’s digital currency electronic paymentFinancial Innovation10.1186/s40854-023-00467-5
Article
The dark side of foreign firm presence: How does the knowledge spillover from foreign direct investment influence the new venture performanceJournal of Innovation & Knowledge10.1016/j.jik.2023.100399
Article
How does natural disasters affect China agricultural economic growth？Energy10.1016/j.energy.2024.131096
Article
Strategic responses to market uncertainty: performance value of strategic agility and online-to-offline platform adoptionEnterprise Information Systems10.1080/17517575.2023.2292983
Article
A Measurement Tool for the Competitiveness of Startups’ Innovation EcosystemJournal of the Knowledge Economy10.1007/s13132-023-01170-7
Article
Effectiveness of industry-university-research cooperation in China: impact of innovation input and open innovation environmentInternational Journal of Innovation Science10.1108/IJIS-08-2020-0122
Article
The performance of specialized and oriented diversified firms: A comparative analysis from the targeted expansion of renewable energy business of listed companiesInternational Review of Financial Analysis10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102742
Chapter
Dynamics of Innovation Ecosystems: Orchestrating Actors and Interactions in Emerging EconomiesNew Topics in Emerging Markets10.5772/intechopen.111629
Article
Optimal Information Acquisition and Sharing DecisionsJournal of Database Management10.4018/JDM.337971

An Empirical Study on Innovation Ecosystem, Technological Trajectory Transition, and Innovation Performance

Yu Sun, Ling Li, Yong Chen, Mikhail Yu Kataev

Source Title: Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM)29(4)

ISSN: 1062-7375|EISSN: 1533-7995|EISBN13: 9781799859031|DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.20210701.oa7

Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Sun, Yu, et al. "An Empirical Study on Innovation Ecosystem, Technological Trajectory Transition, and Innovation Performance." JGIM vol.29, no.4 2021: pp.148-171. http://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20210701.oa7

APA

Sun, Y., Li, L., Chen, Y., & Kataev, M. Y. (2021). An Empirical Study on Innovation Ecosystem, Technological Trajectory Transition, and Innovation Performance. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 29(4), 148-171. http://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20210701.oa7

Chicago

Sun, Yu, et al. "An Empirical Study on Innovation Ecosystem, Technological Trajectory Transition, and Innovation Performance," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM) 29, no.4: 148-171. http://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20210701.oa7

Export Reference

Favorite Full-Issue Download

View Full Text HTML

View Full Text PDF

Abstract

This paper explores technological trajectory transition in the perspective of innovation ecosystem and their effect on innovation performance of latecomers in market. A structural equation model is developed and tested with data collected from 366 firms in China. In specific, this paper categories technological trajectory transition creative accumulative technological trajectory transition (CCT) and creative disruptive technological trajectory transition (CDT). The results indicate that firms' organizational learning ability positively affect their technological trajectory transition and innovation performance. Firms' network relationship strength negatively affects their technological trajectory transition and positively affect their innovation performance. Governments' environmental concerns positively affect firms' technological trajectory transition and their innovation performance, whereas firms' environmental concerns do not. CCT does not positively affect their innovation performance. In contrast, CDT positively affects their innovation performance.